![]() MSFT then hacked a number of files from 3.11 into 3.10, updated the drivers, and bundled the whole lot out. However, there was considerable antitrust rumbling, in that wfw contains networking code, which intrudes on the network market of people like Baynan, Novell, etc. This is the Blue Spine vs Red Spine in OS/2 parlance. Other changes reduced the functionality of Windows against the "OS/2 for Windows" product [where WinOS2 was replaced by running the DOS code. The new Wfw ran a lot faster than either Win310 or 311, and was positioned as the next OEM version (ie computers would ship with Dos 6.22 / Wfw 3.11, usually with a cutdown manual.Ĭonsider, eg the references to OS/2 server in 3.10, against the NT servers in 3.11. Microsoft did some work on it and got it to run somewhat faster.īy the end of 1994, the IBM/Microsoft partnership expired, and Microsoft released DOS 6.22 and Windows for Workgroups 3.11 accordingly. What essentially happened was Wfw 3.10 was started as a research project, it ran slower than regular win 3.10, that it was referred to as "Windows for Warehouses" (part of "Windows Everywhere"). In fact, all four variations of Windows exits. There is indeed a 'Windows 3.11', along with things like 'Windows for Workgroups 3.10'.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |